Disclosure v1.0.0-p1
Methodology.
This page exists so a plaintiff's expert reading it during discovery finds a coherent, conservative account of how we produce intelligence. It also exists so a prospective buyer evaluating the platform can see the guardrails before they sign anything.
What we publish.
We publish regulatory intelligence: structured summaries of publicly available regulatory texts, guidance, and enforcement actions; derived scores and risk indicators; and gap analyses against named frameworks. We do not publish legal advice, verdicts, certifications, or filings submitted on behalf of a customer.
Data sources.
Our intelligence is drawn from regulator-published sources. Frameworks like SEC EDGAR, FinCEN, ESMA, VARA, OFAC, UN sanctions consolidated lists, EU financial sanctions, GoldRush, Alchemy, and Covalent are canonical. Each published figure on our surfaces cites the regulator and the retrieval date. When an official source contradicts a prior assertion of ours, the regulator controls and we update the output, versioning the disclosure.
Signals and scoring.
Product scores (TRACR risk, LexAudit health, DocAI confidence, LeadForge intent) are produced from documented signal registries. Each signal carries a weight, a rationale, and the source it was derived from. The registries for every product are published under the product's methodology section.
Human review.
No output ships without a named human reviewer signing off. This is a liability firewall, not a performance step. Human reviewers verify sources, flag uncertainty, and can hold delivery if any assertion cannot be substantiated. The signoff is recorded alongside the disclaimer version stamp on every output.
Handling uncertainty.
When coverage is incomplete, ambiguous, or disputed, we say so rather than infer. 'Out of scope' is an acceptable output. 'Unverified' is an acceptable output. 'Requires counsel in your jurisdiction' is an acceptable output. We prefer a conservative admission to a confident fabrication, every time.
Versioning and reproducibility.
Every output we publish carries a disclosure version stamp (v1.0.0-p1 at the time this page was generated) and an issued_at timestamp. If an assertion is ever challenged, the stamp lets us reproduce exactly which disclosure was in force and which signal registry was active when the intelligence was produced.
Incident response.
If a published output is challenged — by a customer, a regulator, or counsel — we follow the Liability Incident Response SOP: preserve the snapshot, preserve the disclaimer version, notify counsel, do not admit fault prior to review. The SOP is published in our workflows library and linked from the Trust page.
Published content (disclosure v1.0.0-p1).
Long-form regulatory analysis is published at blog.bizlegal-ai.com. Every post lists its source URLs in a footer block and carries a disclosure-version stamp. Drafts move through a manual-approval gate before publish — agents rank candidates, a human picks the topic, and a human approves the final page before it ships. Rejections are written to an audit log alongside the version stamp so any prior assertion is reproducible in discovery.
Per-product methodology.
Each product publishes its own methodology page linking back here. Those pages carry the signal registries, scoring weights, and known-gap lists that govern each product's output.
Disclosure v1.0.0-p1
What we are. What we are not.
We are not a law firm.
BizLegal AI is a regulatory intelligence platform. We do not practice law in any jurisdiction. Accessing this site or using our tools does not create an attorney-client relationship.
This is not legal advice.
Our output is intelligence: analysis, summaries, and machine-assisted interpretation of publicly available regulatory information. It is not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.
Every output passes human review.
No intelligence ships to a customer without a named human reviewer signing off. The reviewer verifies sources, flags uncertainty, and can hold delivery if any assertion cannot be substantiated.
We do not file on your behalf.
We do not submit filings to FinCEN, the SEC, a court, a registry, or any other regulator for you. Where our output references a filing, you remain the filer of record and are responsible for submission, timing, accuracy, and consequences.
Jurisdictional scope is finite.
Our intelligence covers specified jurisdictions and frameworks. Gaps exist. If a question sits outside our coverage, we say so rather than infer. The pages listing covered jurisdictions and frameworks control.
Regulation changes. We do not warrant currency.
Regulatory texts, enforcement postures, and guidance evolve continuously. We make reasonable efforts to keep intelligence current, but we do not warrant that any output is complete or up-to-date at the moment you act on it. The disclosure version and issue timestamp on each output pin what was in force when the intelligence was produced.
Limits of liability.
Use of our intelligence is at your own risk and, where applicable, subject to the liability limits in our Terms. We are not liable for outcomes of decisions you make after reading our intelligence, including filings you submit, contracts you sign, or transactions you execute. If you have a complaint or a concern about a specific output, our incident response procedure is published on the Trust page.
BizLegal AI publishes regulatory intelligence. We are not a law firm. This is not legal advice. All output is reviewed by a human analyst before release and is subject to the version-stamped disclosure in force at the moment of issue.